Brief-term landlords may not give you the chance to sh-sh-shake it off in the case of the extra taxes they could be chargeable for. This follows the introduction of Rhode Island’s “Taylor Swift tax,” the nickname given to part-time residents who personal trip leases.
With different states following go well with, tensions are escalating between native municipalities, brokers, brokers, and the rich property house owners they symbolize.
What’s the Taylor Swift Tax?
The so-called Taylor Swift tax—formally often known as the Non-Proprietor-Occupied Property Tax Act—will take impact on July 1, 2026. It imposes an annual surcharge on non-primary residences (i.e., houses not occupied by their house owners or tenants for not less than 183 days a yr) that are valued at greater than $1 million.
The surcharge is ready at $2.50 for each $500 of assessed worth above that threshold. Utilizing these metrics, Kiplinger calculated {that a} $3 million property would face a surcharge of roughly $10,000 yearly, along with common property taxes.
The tax was named after the pop celebrity as a result of Swift bought a mansion within the upscale Watch Hill part of Rhode Island in 2013, the place she is a part-time resident. It’s estimated that she will probably be liable for an additional $136,000 yearly when the brand new tax takes impact.
Proponents and Opponents
The purpose of the extra levy, in keeping with the state, is to increase income that helps housing initiatives whereas lowering the variety of residences that stay vacant for a lot of the yr. Within the case of short-term landlords, this might be devastating to their backside line, as they might not solely be taxed on the income they make as a landlord, but additionally from the Taylor Swift tax too, in the event that they hire the house for greater than 183 days a yr however not as a long-term rental.
The brand new tax has not been nicely obtained by many inside the true property trade. “These are individuals who simply come right here for the summer season, spend their cash, and pay their fair proportion of taxes,” Donna Krueger-Simmons, gross sales agent with Mott & Chace Sotheby’s Worldwide in Watch Hill, Rhode Island, informed CNBC. “They’re getting penalized simply because additionally they reside some place else.”
“You’re simply hurting the individuals who assist small enterprise,” Lori Joyal of the Lila Delman Compass workplace in Watch Hill, informed CNBC. “You’re chasing away the individuals who spend a lot of the cash in these cities.”
Brokers worry that the tax may backfire on trip householders, who may select to spend their cash on close by trip cities with much less stringent tax legal guidelines.
Different States Are Implementing Related Taxes
Montana
Montana just lately handed reforms set to take impact in 2026, which equally distinguish between major residences and long-term leases versus secondary/trip houses and short-term leases. The state skilled an inflow of recent residents from New York and different main cities throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Montana’s new system would require non-primary residents and short-term rental house owners to pay a flat fee of 1.90% starting in 2026, whatever the property worth. Nevertheless, houses used as major residences or for long-term leases can qualify for decrease, tiered charges, relying on market values, in keeping with the Montana Division of Income.
There are caveats to Montana’s program. Owners who reside of their residences for not less than seven months of the yr, or have long-term leases, could qualify for decreased charges and a one-time rebate for 2025, in keeping with tax compliance web site Avalara. The location additionally estimates that second houses and higher-value properties will bear a larger share of the tax burden resulting from their greater tax charges.
Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Cape Cod is contemplating becoming a member of close by Rhode Island in taxing prosperous part-time residents. Nevertheless, reasonably than an annual tax, Cape Cod will apply a “mansion tax” within the type of a 2% actual property switch tax on gross sales of over $2 million. Proponents argue that it may generate round $56 million yearly for reasonably priced and year-round housing.
Rob Brennan, chief authorized officer on the nonprofit group Housing Help, informed Cape Cod’s native authorities web site:
“This is now not a cyclical scarcity—it’s an existential disaster. And not using a everlasting, predictable supply of funding, we can not assist housing that working Cape Codders can truly afford. There’s no method out of this disaster with out daring, systemic options. The $2,000,000 residence changing into $2,040,000 doesn’t cease second-home patrons.”
Conversely, full-time residents in Chatham, Cape Cod, will obtain a 35% property tax exemption as of July 1, 2026.
“The huge quantity of wealth on this city in residential property is held by a disproportionate quantity of people that aren’t residents of this city,” Chatham group board member Seth Taylor informed the Cape Cod Chronicle. “I don’t suppose it’s an excessive amount of to ask to have a look at this as a sensible method to assist the middle-income people that we are saying we wish to have in our group.”
Chatham and 10 different communities on the Cape and islands, in addition to six different cities and cities throughout the state, together with Boston, have adopted a residential tax exemption.
California
Los Angeles’ “mansion tax,” often known as Measure ULA, imposes a 4% switch tax on property gross sales between $5 million and $10 million, and a 5.5% tax on gross sales above $10 million to assist reasonably priced housing and homeless prevention applications. Nevertheless, the tax has just lately been below scrutiny and will be eradicated to encourage improvement.
“It was bought as a mansion tax, which implies massive homes for wealthy folks, however it truly had a chilling impact on housing development, significantly flats,” former Meeting Speaker Bob Hertzberg, who was tapped by Mayor Karen Bass to work out the small print of the legislative proposal, informed the Los Angeles Occasions.
Issues Brief-Time period Rental House owners Ought to Hold In Thoughts
Should you personal a short-term rental in states like Rhode Island or Montana, you will want to pay specific consideration to:
- The variety of days you reside within the property personally as a major residence versus the times you hire it.
- Hold information of residency use dates versus short-term and mid-term rental occupancy.
- Weigh the earnings generated from the rental versus the tax payable by not occupying it to qualify for residency restrictions to calculate the most effective use of your property.
Remaining Ideas: Grey Areas
I might by no means advocate discovering methods to avoid the brand new guidelines, however there are some grey areas that astute traders may make the most of.
Should you reside in a bit of your house whereas additionally utilizing it as a short-term rental, your tax legal responsibility will probably be decided based mostly on the share of the home you occupy. In actuality, it’s unlikely that an IRS consultant will go to to confirm the apportioned use of your rental.
If sure areas, such because the kitchen and TV areas, are collectively used, their delineation turns into much more opaque. Throw ADUs, completed basements, and attics into the combination, and who lives in what elements of the property presents an fascinating proposition for an accountant who is aware of how far to bend the principles.
Conversely, and fewer probably to attract consideration, is to merely ramp up your short-term earnings as a lot as doable whereas making the most of renovation and depreciation tax deductions. Pay the brand new taxes as required, and revel in night time’s sleep.
