Peter Endig | AFP | Getty Pictures
The New Jersey legal professional basic sued Amazon on Wednesday, alleging the corporate has violated the rights of hundreds of pregnant workers and staffers with disabilities who work in a number of of its amenities within the state.
The grievance, filed in Essex County Superior Court docket by the workplace of Legal professional Normal Matthew Platkin, alleges Amazon violated state anti-discrimination regulation in the way it treats pregnant workers and workers with disabilities once they request a piece lodging.
The state stated the lawsuit follows a years-long investigation by its civil rights division into Amazon’s remedy of employees at warehouses throughout New Jersey.
In accordance with the go well with, the state’s investigation discovered that since October 2015, Amazon allegedly violated pregnant and disabled workers’ rights by putting them on unpaid go away once they request lodging, denied them cheap lodging and “unreasonably” delayed its responses to employees’ requests.
It additionally alleged that Amazon “unlawfully” retaliates towards these employees once they search an lodging, together with by firing them. After employees are granted an lodging, Amazon allegedly fired some workers for “failing to satisfy the corporate’s inflexible productiveness necessities.”
“There isn’t a excuse for Amazon’s shameful remedy of pregnant employees and employees with disabilities,” Platkin stated in an announcement. “Amazon’s egregious conduct has induced huge harm to pregnant employees and employees with disabilities in our state, and it should cease now.”
Amazon spokesperson Kelly Nantel stated in an announcement that accusations it would not comply with federal and state legal guidelines like New Jersey’s anti-discrimination regulation are “merely not true.”
“Guaranteeing the well being and well-being of our workers is our high precedence, and we’re dedicated to offering a protected and supportive atmosphere for everybody,” Nantel stated.
The corporate stated it approves greater than 99% of being pregnant lodging requests submitted by employees. Amazon additionally denied putting pregnant employees mechanically on go away, in addition to claims that it unjustifiably rejects lodging requests.
The grievance seeks to require that Amazon pay unspecified compensatory damages and civil fines, in addition to courtroom orders requiring the corporate to regulate its insurance policies and to undergo monitoring and reporting necessities for 5 years, amongst different cures.
One incident described within the grievance states that an unnamed pregnant worker acquired an lodging that permitted her to take extra breaks and restricted her from lifting objects heavier than 15 kilos.
Lower than a month after the lodging was authorized, she was allegedly terminated for “not assembly packing numbers,” the lawsuit states, although her lodging required her pack fewer objects every shift.
In one other case, a pregnant worker’s lodging request was closed attributable to an absence of medical paperwork when the requested paperwork weren’t required. Whereas the employee tried to resubmit her request, she allegedly acquired three warnings for “poor productiveness,” and was in the end fired for “not making price,” in accordance with the grievance.
Amazon’s inner investigation of her case did not verify that the worker was fired attributable to her being pregnant, however the firm in the end reinstated her with backpay, the lawsuit says.
Amazon stated in an announcement that it would not have mounted quotas at its amenities, including that it assesses efficiency “primarily based on protected and achievable expectations and consider time and tenure, peer efficiency, and adherence to protected work practices.”
“Amazon’s discriminatory practices and systemic failure to accommodate pregnant employees and employees with disabilities have the impact of pushing these workers out of Amazon’s workforce — the exact final result the [Law Against Discrimination] was supposed to stop,” in accordance with the lawsuit.
Amazon’s remedy of pregnant workers and others in its sprawling front-line workforce has come below scrutiny previously.
The corporate, which is the nation’s second-largest non-public employer, has confronted lawsuits from employees at its warehouses, who alleged the corporate didn’t accommodate them as soon as they had been pregnant, then fired them for failing to satisfy efficiency requirements, CNET reported.
The Equal Employment Alternative Fee final 12 months opened a probe into Amazon’s remedy of pregnant employees in its warehouses after six senators urged it to take action, citing a “regarding sample of mistreatment.”
New York’s Division of Human Rights in 2022 filed a grievance towards Amazon alleging it discriminates towards pregnant employees and employees with disabilities at its amenities.
Amazon stated it would not touch upon ongoing litigation.
