Close Menu
Trade Verdict
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Economy
  • Stocks
  • Bonds
  • Commodities
  • Cryptocurrencies

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

What's Hot

Crypto market shakes off document liquidation: Bitmine chair

October 26, 2025

The Sunday Morning Film Presents: Peppermint Soda (1977) Run Time: 1H 40M Bonus: Unique Poetry!

October 26, 2025

18 Retro Lunchboxes That Are Now Collector’s Objects

October 26, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trade Verdict
  • Latest News
  • Investing
  • Personal Finance
  • Retirement
  • Economy
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Trade Verdict
Home»Bonds»Surging power demand, federal headwinds, and the $140B public energy buildout
Bonds

Surging power demand, federal headwinds, and the $140B public energy buildout

EditorialBy EditorialOctober 21, 2025No Comments21 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Surging power demand, federal headwinds, and the 0B public energy buildout
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Transcript:

Mike Scarchilli (00:04):

Hello everybody, and welcome to the Bond Purchaser podcast, your trusted supply for insights on all issues public finance. I am Mike Scarchilli, editor-in-chief of the Bond Purchaser, and on this episode, the Bomb Purchaser’s Northeast Reporter Christina Baker, is joined by Tom Falcone, president of the Massive Public Energy Council for a deep dive into the pressing power and infrastructure calls for going through public energy utilities. Recent off the PPCs Annual Monetary Convention, Tom breaks down what’s driving the unprecedented surge in electrical energy load development, particularly in areas seeing fast growth from AI knowledge facilities and superior manufacturing, and the way utilities are grappling with the lengthy timelines and steep prices required to fulfill that demand. He additionally explores the affordability challenges for fee payers, the blended indicators coming from federal coverage and the shifting regulatory panorama. Utilities should navigate as they construct for each the current and the longer term. Let’s get into it.

Christina Baker (01:06):

Hello, welcome to the Bond Purchaser Podcast. I am Northeast Reporter Christina Baker, and with me right this moment is Tom Falcon, president of the Massive Public Energy Council. Tom, thanks for becoming a member of us.

Tom Falcone (01:16):

Thanks, Christina, for having me.

Christina Baker (01:18):

And for listeners who may be unaware, the LPPC simply held its annual convention. What had been your takeaways from the convention, Tom?

Tom Falcone (01:27):

Nicely, it was a monetary convention, so it was actually focused to the bond consumers viewers, the monetary neighborhood, buyers, bankers, attorneys, all these kinds of of us. I believe the large elephant within the room, not only for public energy, but in addition for the electrical business, is load development. I imply, after 25 or so years of flat to declining load, which minimized the quantity we wanted to spend money on our grid right this moment, we now have important development and it isn’t evenly unfold throughout the nation, however in about half of our LPPC members, we now have 30 giant utilities. About half of these we see very, very fast development. And that is from AI and knowledge facilities and manufacturing. And it is in locations like Texas and Oklahoma, Arizona, Nebraska, South Carolina, Georgia, upstate New York. So it is in pockets the place you possibly can construct fast, the place there’s capability to serve, the place there’s the appropriate workforce.

(02:28):

I believe that is in all probability the primary factor. And possibly the quantity two factor that we talked lots about in our panels with our many CEOs was that this time that load development could be very totally different than what we have seen The final time we noticed a whole lot of load development, which is within the fifties and sixties after which slowing down, however nonetheless some within the seventies and eighties, the final time anyone moved to city they usually wanted 5 megawatts or 10 megawatts or one thing like that. Now they moved to city they usually want 500 megawatts or a thousand megawatts, and you might not know what a megawatt is, however that is a full energy plant. Or two a thousand megawatts is sufficient to serve 650,000 residential prospects. And so they additionally need it fast. It takes us 6, 7, 8 years to construct infrastructure, however they’re trying to get related to the grid very quickly, actually lots lower than that.

(03:22):

So we spent a whole lot of time speaking about that, and I hope what the convention attendees walked away with is that every of these utilities have a great deal with on that danger. Various our CEOs talked about their methods. Some like Javier Fernandez of OPPD stated, Hey, deliver your individual era. Should you’ve received contracts, renewable, dispatchable, no matter, you assign ’em to us, we will serve you quicker. LCRA spoke about fast transmission construct out. They have a few $5 billion, 5 12 months funding in Texas transmission, together with a Texas’s first 765 KV line, which is a really, very excessive voltage. Others are searching for long-term contracts. So in whole, we went from an period of flat development to one thing that your listeners could be fascinated by. We’ll be spending a minimum of $140 billion over the subsequent decade, constructing about 60 gigawatts of era in transmission.

Christina Baker (04:22):

And the entire surging demand is coinciding with a whole lot of concern, particularly from the states within the northeast that I cowl concerning the affordability of all the things actually, however particularly individuals’s utility payments. Are you able to speak about what’s fueling the utility, the affordability challenges, and the way your members are attempting to stability the necessity for affordability with the fast growth that that you must perform?

Tom Falcone (04:56):

Positive. Nicely, let me first speak about what is going on on within the northeast after which about the issue extra broadly. There’s been lots within the information that could be very particular to the PJM electrical energy market that stands for Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, which had been the important thing states that based that market, but it surely’s throughout 13 states, consists of locations like Virginia, Ohio, Illinois, North Carolina. So it isn’t simply restricted to these three, however what’s been within the information is a variety of governors have been asking for reforms in PJM. They have been searching for board seats, and their primary situation is that capability costs and electrical costs in these markets is up fairly a bit. And the explanation it is up is as a result of demand’s up fairly a bit. And so I believe it is in all probability necessary as background for folk who’re much less centered on electrical energy markets, perceive that they operate at two ranges, they do two various things.

(05:51):

So the very first thing is that they optimize what’s there, do I run this plant or do I run that plant? And the difficulty is that you might have totally different crops owned by totally different individuals, but it surely’s extra financial to run one plant at full capability than two crops at half capability. So there’s sort of features from commerce like an influence pool. And in order that features fairly properly in optimizing what’s there. The issue is the second, which is attracting new era and planning and constructing transmission. And that second stage actually hasn’t been examined in these markets since they had been established within the late Nineteen Nineties. We have had flat or declining load. We’ve not actually wanted a whole lot of new entry. We’ve not wanted a whole lot of transmission construct, however one man’s opinion. However I believe what we’re seeing right here is that these constructs, they had been designed by economists in principle, and now we’re seeing how properly they work in apply for the primary time.

(06:56):

And for a lot of, the reply is they do not work that properly. However I believe it is also necessary to know that a whole lot of the explanations they don’t seem to be working are simply coverage decisions, their coverage decisions inside these states, their coverage decisions at FERC. And inside these markets, and I will simply offer you one instance, even inside these states, a few of them like Virginia, enable investor-owned utilities to personal era and others like Pennsylvania don’t. And what meaning is that in a state like Virginia, prospects for the reason that utility owns era, are hedged for rising capability costs as a result of they’ve the upper price available in the market, however in addition they personal the asset. Somewhere else like Pennsylvania, they don’t seem to be hedged they usually’re completely reliant in the marketplace. And one of many issues that occurs that having been a former utility, CEOI can let you know, being completely unhedged towards quickly rising costs just isn’t typically one thing that is going to be a buyer pleaser.

(08:02):

Most of our utilities are public energy utilities are vertically built-in, and I believe a whole lot of states are actually taking a look at that and revisiting it. There’s payments launched. I do not know whether or not these payments will cross. And like I stated, our members, even once they take part in these markets, are typically a minimum of partially hedged. And so the opposite a part of that’s whether or not these markets are actually even attracting the brand new entry that they hope for. We have now a very excessive worth. And the purpose is in order that now it sends a worth sign to draw new era. And it is necessary to notice that these markets are sort of in identify solely. They’re actually administrative guidelines. They don’t seem to be really markets. They’re sort of a type of regulation that is very complicated and components pushed. And the reply is they do not actually appeal to new entry that properly both. So we now have excessive costs with out attracting the brand new entry.

(08:53):

We have now retirements though we now have shortfalls within the out years, and it simply results in an surroundings the place individuals begin to query, is that this working properly? In order that could be very distinctive to PJM. That’s not the electrical business total. Some states do not even have markets. A whole lot of our members are vertically built-in. Now to your second a part of your query, which is, okay, let’s get out of the northeast and speak about or actually PJM and speak about affordability. And that may be a subject we spend a whole lot of time about within the convention. And usually talking, if we’re in a giant construct cycle, new prices greater than outdated, the marginal price of recent stuff is greater than the common price of the outdated stuff. So if we’re in a serious construct cycle that tends to lift price. And I believe the distinctive factor right here is we’re constructing lots, but it surely’s for a handful of industries that are very, crucial industries, ai, superior manufacturing.

(09:50):

If you wish to win the AI race, if you wish to reshore essential manufacturing chips, issues like that, then you need to have the electrical energy that provides it. However it’s additionally necessary to guarantee that, and that is one thing that is routinely executed within the electrical enterprise, that you simply cost the appropriate individuals, the appropriate worth. So if what’s elevating the value is knowledge facilities and constructing for knowledge facilities, for instance, you do not need to cost your residential buyer extra when their price to serve hasn’t gone up. And in order that’s a fee design situation and there is a number of novel issues, novel points for us to cope with in there, however these should not insurmountable issues. These are issues which might be routine. We’re simply coping with them on this new occasion.

Christina Baker (10:37):

And whilst you’re on this constructed cycle, I do know many states even have emissions objectives and previous to the inflow of knowledge facilities had been making an attempt to transition or a minimum of create extra renewable power. How are these priorities faring within the face of this drastic demand?

Tom Falcone (11:04):

Lots of our states and our localities and our public energy utilities have renewable objectives. Usually talking, we’re in construct all the things mode, particularly when you might have fast development, you are constructing no matter you have received plans for. You’ve got typically been making an attempt to, it takes a very long time to allow issues and purchase land and proper of the way and order gear. So if you happen to’ve received one thing within the pipeline, you are going to construct it. And utilities are constructing all the things. Our members are constructing wind and photo voltaic, however they’re constructing pump storage. They’re constructing batteries, they’re constructing hydrogen carbon seize. They’re taking a look at nuclear in numerous methods. They’re taking a look at gasoline crops, they’re taking a look at extending the lifetime of their present belongings. Even issues they had been planning to retire. They could sluggish the retirement as a result of there’s extra power demand than we will instantly meet. So I believe it is sort of necessary to acknowledge although that there was a change in federal coverage within the one massive stunning invoice, the tax invoice that was handed earlier this 12 months.

(12:05):

However you probably have been engaged on and are fairly far alongside on a wind and photo voltaic challenge, you need to be capable to safe the tax credit. It mustn’t have an effect on your challenge. There’s some guidelines in there and issues you need to do, however I believe the second factor to notice that is additionally necessary, one wag stated that the one massive stunning invoice was the second largest clear power invoice within the nation’s historical past, which is attention-grabbing and likewise true. The primary was the unique invoice handed within the Biden administration, however this was the second greatest as a result of it preserved a whole lot of incentives. It did make some adjustments on wind and photo voltaic, however the incentives for storage for hydrogen, carbon seize, nuclear, these nonetheless exist. And never solely do they exist, they may properly prolong if you happen to start a challenge and start development into the 2040s. So tax coverage has modified, federal grants have modified a bit bit, however if you happen to received a challenge far sufficient alongside that is wind and photo voltaic, you need to be capable to proceed with it.

(13:09):

And if you happen to’re taking a look at these new, extra rising applied sciences, these tax credit proceed. The second a part of that, you might have state and native coverage, and that is crucial and individuals are continuing a tempo. However I believe it is also actually necessary to know that within the electrical enterprise, you are additionally pushed by the useful resource that is accessible to you, and the assets should not evenly unfold throughout the nation. Some locations simply have a greater hydro useful resource just like the Pacific Northwest or Northern New York, large hydro useful resource. You are going to use that. Or considered one of our members, GRDA, there’s CEO, Dan Sullivan likes to notice they’re from Oklahoma. So he likes to notice that Oklahoma is the place the wind comes sweeping down the airplane. There’s a whole lot of wind there. So it is a massive pure gasoline state, but it surely’s a giant wind state, so you are going to have a whole lot of wind and pure gasoline in Oklahoma no matter federal coverage. So I believe that sort of summarizes the place individuals are, initiatives which might be within the pipeline are transferring forward lots nonetheless to do on rising applied sciences and individuals are going to have a look at their native assets and native necessities.

Christina Baker (14:15):

Yeah. And let’s speak extra concerning the federal panorama. I do know lately the president has been going after particular grants to sure renewable power initiatives like Revolution Wind in Connecticut, which is I assume nonetheless in courtroom. Are you able to speak about how the administration’s angle in the direction of pure gasoline and I assume typically particular initiatives and particular states goes over together with your members and the way they’re feeling about taking up main initiatives like this with the risk that they may have their approval rescinded or obtain a cease work order?

Tom Falcone (15:04):

Positive. So there’s two issues there. One among them has to cope with federal permits which were issued on initiatives. One other one is grants. I believe it is necessary to notice that each administration resets coverage in their very own route. This administration could also be a bit extra aggressive than most, however each administration resets coverage in their very own route. We have now some members which have misplaced grants. They’re typically within the 30 to $50 million class. We choose to not see that. On the identical time, I do suppose it is sort of attention-grabbing that if you happen to return to the one massive stunning invoice and I discussed it was the second largest clear power invoice within the nation’s historical past. So the invoice was initially handed below the Biden administration and it was handed on a celebration line vote, and now these subsidies have gone via the meat grinder on a celebration line vote by the opposite celebration within the reconciliation invoice, and it seems that there is a whole lot of consensus on much more stuff than you might need assumed.

(16:07):

So issues which might be nonetheless being incentivized by each events for the long run storage, hydrogen carbon seize, nuclear. So there’s lots to do there that there actually is a few bipartisan consensus even in an period when Washington dc it is exhausting to get 60 votes on something. However the course of we have come by appears to point that there’s a consensus on sure of those applied sciences that that is the place federal coverage ought to incent. To your query about explicit initiatives, clearly if you’re going to be within the enterprise of financing explicit initiatives, notably for the builders take offshore wind, I believe it will in all probability give an offshore wind developer, which isn’t typically a utility. Most of our utilities are constructing transmission infrastructure. They don’t seem to be going constructing offshore wind, however they might signal a contract for it. However for the developer, look, they will suppose twice earlier than they commit the funds except they suppose that they will get that challenge executed inside a timeframe, the administration has a specific view on that know-how.

Christina Baker (17:19):

And within the subsequent massive power invoice or the subsequent regulatory change, what insurance policies would you and your members wish to see from Washington?

Tom Falcone (17:29):

Nicely, it is exhausting to get a giant power invoice. We’ve not had one since about 2005 more and more as a result of you possibly can’t get 60 votes within the Senate for bipartisan payments. You see adjustments which might be on a celebration line vote on one thing like funds reconciliation, so tax funds kind coverage, and also you see a whole lot of administration administrative actions, whether or not via govt orders or a regulatory surroundings. In order that tends to be the place the motion is. Proper now, the Congress is engaged on a few payments. One is allowing reform. We’re professional allowing reform. There’s two ways in which initiatives can get slowed down, and it could be federal and it could be state, but it surely’s an necessary factor. We’re on this main construct cycle and for instance, we have a member that is been looking for federal permits on a non-controversial transmission line for about 12 years. If it takes you 12 years to allow one thing that is wanted, you are simply not going to fulfill the second.

(18:32):

So federal allowing is necessary. A whole lot of instances state allowing is necessary. Many of the initiatives don’t undergo federal allowing. Most undergo state allowing, however some issues are federal, and so allowing reforms necessary. Whether or not we’ll get to 60 votes for one thing that may be meaningfully useful, exhausting to say. These issues are exhausting to do. There is a reforms at FEMA which might be being contemplated. There is a bipartisan invoice in the home on FEMA reforms that was launched within the Home Transportation Infrastructure Committee. It is a good invoice. It is a bipartisan invoice. It was moved via committee by the chair and the rating member, the Republican and the Democrat, and it will considerably pace reimbursements and initiatives. When you might have a giant catastrophe, it is actually necessary that you simply need to get these communities again on their toes and likewise investing in resiliency and infrastructure rapidly. In order that Invoice is an excellent invoice.

(19:34):

We very hopeful Invoice like that would cross whether or not it may or not. The Senate has not taken it up but, however the truth that it moved via the home in a bipartisan style, that is actually good. However a whole lot of the motion is that EPA and FERC and NERC and allowing reforms which might be govt taken via govt motion moderately than federal payments. And plenty of of these are useful. I do suppose the administration’s extraordinarily centered on the truth that we now have this electrical energy power want and that we will have to maneuver issues alongside quicker if we need to meet the second.

Christina Baker (20:13):

And the opposite federal coverage that I assume is usually an elephant within the room, which I do know was mentioned on the convention, was tariffs and their influence on the constructing new infrastructure and on the US financial system normally. Are you able to speak about how tariffs are going to have an effect on your member utilities?

Tom Falcone (20:36):

Yeah, I believe it is too quickly to inform. We simply had a gathering of our provide chain working group. It was the leaders of provide chain amongst our 30 utilities, and we’re monitoring, there’s some issues that may make a giant distinction, and there could also be price strain coming down the pike. Will we strike offers with Canada and Mexico? We have now a whole lot of gear that comes from these two nations or metal tariffs. What we’re seeing principally at this level is that suppliers are passing alongside the danger. So once they negotiate contracts which might be long run, not for supply of a chunk of kit on a purchase order order in a couple of weeks or a month, however issues which have lengthy lead time, the suppliers are passing alongside the danger. They’re asking for within the contract this to be a plus or minus kind merchandise as a result of no person actually is aware of the place it is going. So we’ll see what offers the nation strikes and the place these points come out. Administration has been keen to pay attention on particular points, so I believe that that is good, however I believe it is actually too quickly to inform what tariffs imply. It relies on the place the story ends and the story. The president simply had a gathering with the Prime Minister of Canada yesterday. They did not attain an settlement, however I believe it is simply too quickly to inform.

Christina Baker (21:58):

Yeah, and we’re developing on our time. Is there the rest, some other topics that had been lined on the convention that you really want listeners to learn about?

Tom Falcone (22:08):

I believe we lined all of the highlights. I believe the large image is we’re constructing, we’re serious about constructing, we’re serious about how we handle the danger, and positively LPPC could be very centered on serving to our utilities examine notes and finest practices, but in addition advocate for issues in Washington DC which might be going to be useful to them.

Christina Baker (22:28):

Thanks once more for becoming a member of us, Tom.

Tom Falcone (22:31):

Nicely, I actually admire it. I began my profession as an funding banker and a loyal bond purchaser reader for a few years earlier than I moved into the CEO function at considered one of our utilities and now into coverage in dc So a very long time bond purchaser reader.

Christina Baker (22:47):

We love to listen to it. Thanks once more.

Tom Falcone (22:49):

Thanks.

Mike Scarchilli (22:50):

That is a wrap for this episode of the Bond Purchaser podcast. A giant thanks to Tom Falcone for his insights, and to Christina Baker for main the dialog. Listed below are three key takeaways from right this moment’s episode. One electrical load is surging after many years of stagnation, pushed by large demand from AI knowledge facilities and manufacturing with utilities throughout areas like Texas, Arizona, and the Northeast. Planning greater than 140 billion in infrastructure funding over the subsequent decade. Two, affordability stays a essential concern, particularly in markets like PJM Pennsylvania and New Jersey, Maryland, the place capability costs are spiking public energy. Utilities are working to make sure the appropriate prospects bear the price of development whereas shielding residential fee payers from pointless will increase. And three, federal coverage is creating alternative and uncertainty with continued incentives for rising clear power applied sciences like hydrogen and carbon seize, but in addition rising regulatory friction round allowing, grant rescission, and offshore wind growth. Thanks once more for listening to the Bomb Purchaser Podcast. This episode was produced by the bomb purchaser. Should you appreciated what you heard, please subscribe in your favourite podcast platform. Go away us a overview and go to us@www.bombbuyer.com for extra of our award-winning protection. Till subsequent time, I am Mike Scarchilli signing off.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Editorial
  • Website

Related Posts

Exploring profitable issuance methods | Bond Purchaser

October 25, 2025

Chicago mayor releases long-awaited Ernst & Younger report

October 25, 2025

Oakland USD receives unfavourable outlook from Moody’s

October 25, 2025

Bond markets ignore fairness rally from CPI report

October 24, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Trending Posts

Crypto market shakes off document liquidation: Bitmine chair

October 26, 2025

The Sunday Morning Film Presents: Peppermint Soda (1977) Run Time: 1H 40M Bonus: Unique Poetry!

October 26, 2025

18 Retro Lunchboxes That Are Now Collector’s Objects

October 26, 2025

Ice Chilly, Zen-Like Investing With Alex King

October 26, 2025
More News
Bonds

Exploring profitable issuance methods | Bond Purchaser

By Editorial
Bonds

Chicago mayor releases long-awaited Ernst & Younger report

By Editorial
Bonds

Oakland USD receives unfavourable outlook from Moody’s

By Editorial
Trade Verdict
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Service
© 2025 Trade Verdict. All rights reserved by Trade Verdict.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.